NewsTerror AttackTexas

AP Totally Ignores Clear Indicators Of Islamist Involvement In Texas Terror Attack

AP Ignores Clear Indicators of Islamist Involvement in Texas Terror Attack

Since news broke of the terrorist attack in Garland, Texas Sunday evening and continuing until early this morning, the Associated Press, perhaps best nicknamed Allah’s Press in instances such as these, was determined not to reveal the nature of those behind it. Two attackers were killed by police after opening fire and wounding a security officer, who, according to AP, “was treated and released from a local hospital.”

The attack took place outside the city’s Curtis Culwell Center, where a “First Annual Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest” was being held. Despite information available at the time of each filing, dispatches submitted by a pair of AP reporters at 1:20 a.m (saved here for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes) and 7:12 a.m. (saved here) would only say that it “remained unclear” and “was not immediately clear,” respectively, whether the attack wes related to the event. The wire service’s Nomaan Merchant and Jamie Stengle also used their final paragraph in each item to engage in an implied blame-the-victim exercise.

Here are excerpts from that 1:20 a.m. report filed by Merchant and Stengle (bolds are mine throughout this post):

CITY: 2 GUNMEN KILLED OUTSIDE MUHAMMAD CARTOON CONTEST

Two gunmen were killed Sunday after opening fire on a security officer outside a provocative contest for cartoon depictions of Prophet Muhammad in Texas and a bomb squad was called in to search their vehicle as a precaution, authorities said.

 

The men drove up to the Curtis Culwell Center in the Dallas suburb of Garland as the contest was scheduled to end and began shooting at a security officer, the City of Garland said in a statement. Garland police officers returned fire, killing the men.

 

Police are not aware of any ongoing threat and had not received any credible threats before the event, Harn said.

 

Harn said it was not immediately clear whether the shooting was connected to the event inside, a contest hosted by the New York-based American Freedom Defense Initiative that would award $10,000 for the best cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad.

 

Such drawings are deemed insulting to many followers of Islam and have sparked violence around the world. According to mainstream Islamic tradition, any physical depiction of the Prophet Muhammad – even a respectful one – is considered blasphemous.

 

… Geller told the AP before Sunday’s event that she planned the contest to make a stand for free speech in response to outcries and violence over drawings of Muhammad. Though it remained unclear several hours after the shooting whether it was related to event, she said Sunday night that the shooting showed how “needed our event really was.”

 

When a Chicago-based nonprofit held a January fundraiser in Garland designed to help Muslims combat negative depictions of their faith, Geller spearheaded about 1,000 picketers at the event. One chanted: “Go back to your own countries! We don’t want you here!” Others held signs with messages such as, “Insult those who behead others,” an apparent reference to recent beheadings by the militant group Islamic State.

As of 1:20 a.m., the following was known:

  • Someone had sent a tweet celebrating the attack in the belief that it had been successful before it occurred:

GarlandTexasPreAttackTweet050314

  • Gateway Pundit reported that the “Shariah Is Light was the first one tonight to use the hashtag #TexasAttack and he used it BEFORE the shooting!”
  • Mid-evening, Robert Spencer, who helped organize the event and was inside the Culwell Center, tweeted that he had “received contact from ISIS claiming credit for the Texas shooting.” More
Previous post

GOP Rep Knocks Hillary Clinton Over Texas Shooting ➠ Video

Next post

Texas Jihad Gunman ID’d ➠ Was Previously Subject Of Terror Investigation

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.