Hillary Rodham ClintonNews

Hillary’s Other Benghazi Problem!

Hillary’s Other #Benghazi Problem…

We’ve written extensively on the failings of Hillary Clinton as regards the attack in Benghazi.

But there’s another issue that people often forget or gloss over.

Via Powerline:

In my opinion, Hillary’s biggest problem isn’t Benghazi per se, it is the broader issue of Libya. Why were Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans murdered? Because by September 2012, Libya was a terrorist playground. Since then, things have only gotten worse. Libya has become a failed state, a 21st century source of boat people, as refugees from ubiquitous violence stream across the Mediterranean. Libya is now a haven for ISIS and other terrorist groups; it was on the Libyan coast that ISIS beheaded 30 Christians. Some of the “refugees” now making their way into Europe are, in fact, ISIS agents. In short, Libya is a disaster.

 

Whose disaster? Hillary Clinton’s. It was Hillary who, more than anyone else, pushed to overthrow Moammar Qaddafi. Why? No compelling reason. Qaddafi had been tame ever since the Iraq war, which he interpreted as a threat to his rule. Almost incredibly, Clinton and her cohorts in NATO overthrew Qaddafi (who was subsequently murdered by a mob) without having a plan for what would come next.

 

Who says Hillary Clinton is responsible for the Libya fiasco? She does. In fact, at one point she was poised to claim Libya as the notable accomplishment of her term as Secretary of State. In August 2011, Jake Sullivan, Hillary’s deputy chief of staff, wrote an email in which he summarized “Secretary Clinton’s leadership on Libya.” He sent to it henchwoman Cheryl Mills and State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, who passed it on to Hillary. Sullivan’s email begins:

 

This is basically off the top of my head, with a few consultations of my notes. but it shows S’ [Secretary Clinton’s] leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country’s libya policy from start to finish. let me know what you think.

Media seems to be targeting Republicans over decisions taken by George W. Bush on Iraq, even thought most had nothing to do with those decisions whether they agree with them or not.

But here, where the blame for Libya’s descent into chaos is squarely on Obama and Clinton, when it is part of their whole support for taking out the relative secularists compared to the Islamists, where is the media and Republican questioning over this?

Previous post

Six People Shot, One Killed In Gun-Free D.C. Over An 8-Hours

Next post

What Happens If You REF-- USE To Shake A Politician's HAND In The Middle East? Watch This Video To Find Out!

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.