2020 Census: Judge Bars Trump Administration From Adding Citizenship Question

A federal judge in New York bars the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

“Secretary Ross’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census — even if it did not violate the Constitution itself — was unlawful for a multitude of independent reasons and must be set aside,” Judge Jesse M. Furman wrote.

Throwing Americans under the bus in the interest of social justice. These judge’s need to be stopped!

NBC:

Trending: US Engulfed In The Most Corrupt Scandal In History & All Roads Lead Back To Obama

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration Tuesday from asking about citizenship status on the 2020 census, the first major ruling in cases contending that officials ramrodded the question through for Republican political purposes to intentionally undercount immigrants.

In a 277-page decision that won’t be the final word on the issue, Judge Jesse M. Furman ruled that while such a question would be constitutional, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had added it arbitrarily and not followed proper administrative procedures.

“He failed to consider several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence in the record before him; acted irrationally both in light of that evidence and his own stated decisional criteria; and failed to justify significant departures from past policies and practices,” Furman wrote.

Ross’ explanations for his decision were “unsupported by, or even counter to, the evidence before the agency,” the judge said.

Among other things, the judge said, Ross didn’t follow a law requiring that he give Congress three years notice of any plan to add a question about citizenship to the census.

The ruling came in cases in which 18 states, the District of Columbia, and 15 big cities or counties, and immigrants’ rights groups argued that the Commerce Department, which designs the census, had failed to properly analyze the effect the question would have on households where immigrants live.

A trial on a separate suit on the same issue, filed by the state of California, is underway in San Francisco. The U.S. Supreme Court is also poised to address the issue Feb. 19, meaning the legal issue is far from decided for good.

“We are disappointed and are still reviewing the ruling,” Justice Department spokeswoman Kelly Laco said in a statement. More

If Dems Win House, Massive Number Of Investigations Will Be Launched (Report)
Previous post

Angel Families Storm Pelosi’s Office... Demand She “Build The Wall”

According To Witness Drug Lord ‘El Chapo’ Paid $100 Million Bribe To Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto
Next post

According To Witness Drug Lord ‘El Chapo’ Paid $100 Million Bribe To Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.